Photonica

Notch filter

An optical filter that blocks one narrow band of wavelengths, usually by reflection, and transmits everything else. Specified by center wavelength, blocking depth in optical density, and bandwidth. The standard way to remove a laser line from Raman or fluorescence light before it reaches the spectrometer.

Optics fundamentalsLab practiceUpdated September 2026

A notch filter, also called a band-stop or band-reject filter, is the complement of a bandpass: it transmits across a wide range and blocks one narrow band. In optics the blocked band is almost always a laser line. The canonical case is Raman spectroscopy, where the elastically scattered laser light is many orders of magnitude stronger than the Raman-shifted light a few nanometers away, and the notch removes the laser before the spectrometer sees it. The same part rejects the excitation in laser-induced fluorescence, strips a pump wavelength out of a fiber system, and protects a detector from one specific line.

Three numbers specify a notch. The center wavelength, which for laser-line filters is the laser wavelength (532, 633, 785 nm and so on). The blocking depth, quoted as optical density, OD=log10T\mathrm{OD} = -\log_{10} T, so OD 6 means a transmission of 10610^{-6}, or 60-60 dB. And the bandwidth, quoted as the full width at half transmission and often also as the narrower width over which the OD exceeds a stated value. Outside the notch a good thin-film filter transmits above 90%. Two further specifications matter on the bench, the angle-of-incidence tolerance and the polarization dependence, and both follow from how the notch is made.

Nearly every reflective notch is a Bragg reflector: a periodic modulation of refractive index with period λ/2n\lambda/2n reflects one wavelength and passes the rest (Bragg condition). A thin-film interference notch, typically a rugate coating whose index varies continuously through a layer tens of micrometers thick, is one realization; a volume Bragg grating written in photo-thermo-refractive glass is another; a fiber Bragg grating used in transmission is the same physics inside a fiber; and an all-pass ring resonator makes a notch by resonant coupling instead of by a grating. Coupled-mode theory gives the depth of a uniform index modulation of amplitude δn\delta n and length LL in one line. With the coupling coefficient κ=πδn/λ\kappa = \pi\,\delta n/\lambda, the transmission at the center of the notch is T=sech2(κL)T = \mathrm{sech}^2(\kappa L). OD 6 needs κL=7.6\kappa L = 7.6, and each further unit of κL\kappa L deepens the notch by another 8.7 dB. The full stopband width is Δλ=λδn/n\Delta\lambda = \lambda\,\delta n/n. Those two relations set the design trade: depth comes from the product δnL\delta n \cdot L, width from the ratio δn/n\delta n/n. A thin-film notch with δn\delta n of a few hundredths reaches OD 6 in a few tens of micrometers and is tens of nanometers wide; a volume Bragg grating with δn\delta n near 3×1043 \times 10^{-4} needs about 3 mm of glass for OD 4 and is correspondingly narrow, about 0.1 nm at 532 nm.

Raman shifts are quoted in wavenumbers, and the conversion Δλ=λ2Δν~\Delta\lambda = \lambda^2\,\Delta\tilde{\nu} makes a notch's bandwidth depend on the laser wavelength in a way that matters. At 532 nm, 1 cm1^{-1} is 0.028 nm; at 785 nm it is 0.062 nm. A 17 nm notch at 532 nm therefore blocks about 600 cm1^{-1} of spectrum in total, roughly 300 cm1^{-1} on the Stokes side, which is fine for the 520 cm1^{-1} silicon line and hopeless for anything below 300 cm1^{-1}. Low-frequency Raman, the lattice and layer-breathing modes below 100 cm1^{-1} (2.8 nm at 532 nm), is what volume Bragg grating notches exist for: bandwidths of 5 to 10 cm1^{-1}, OD 3 to 4 per filter, stacked two or three deep to reach OD 8 or more within a few wavenumbers of the laser.

Because the notch is an interference effect it shifts with angle of incidence. For a thin-film filter with effective index neffn_\mathrm{eff} the center moves as λ(θ)=λ01sin2θ/neff2\lambda(\theta) = \lambda_0\sqrt{1 - \sin^2\theta/n_\mathrm{eff}^2}: with neff=2n_\mathrm{eff} = 2, a 532 nm notch sits at 531.5 nm at 5° and 530.0 nm at 10°, a 2 nm shift that a 17 nm notch tolerates and a 0.1 nm volume-grating notch does not. Volume gratings are angle-tuned deliberately for the same reason. Away from normal incidence the s and p polarizations see different effective indices and the notch splits into two slightly offset notches, so specifications are given at normal incidence or over a stated cone half-angle. Thin-film notches are used at 0°; a reflective notch at 45° is a different design with a wider, polarization-split band, closer to a dichroic mirror.

Measuring a deep notch is harder than buying one. A grating spectrometer's stray-light floor is typically OD 3 to 4 in a single stage, so a spectrometer scan of an OD 6 filter shows the instrument's floor, not the filter's. The honest measurement is a laser and a calibrated power meter with 60 dB or more of dynamic range, or a double monochromator, with the out-of-band transmission measured separately with a broadband source; the procedure, with its error budget and the stacked-filter floor test, is in Measuring optical density beyond the stray-light floor. Two related traps: fluorescence from the filter substrate under intense laser illumination fills in the notch during the measurement, and a filter specified at OD 6 over its central band may be only OD 2 to 3 at the edges of its quoted bandwidth, which is where a laser's wavelength drift will eventually put the line.

In integrated photonics the all-pass ring is the notch. At resonance the through-port transmission is T=(at1at)2T = \left(\frac{a - t}{1 - a t}\right)^2 for round-trip amplitude transmission aa and coupling tt, zero at critical coupling (a=ta = t) and only a few dB deep when the two are mismatched, with a width set by the ring's Q rather than by an index modulation. The ring resonator explorer shows the through-port notch deepen and widen as the coupling is swept through critical.

References: T. Erdogan, "Fiber grating spectra," J. Lightwave Technol. 15, 1277 (1997), for the coupled-mode results quoted here; H. A. Macleod, Thin-Film Optical Filters, 4th ed. (CRC Press, 2010), on rugate and notch designs; O. M. Efimov, L. B. Glebov, L. N. Glebova, K. C. Richardson and V. I. Smirnov, "High-efficiency Bragg gratings in photothermorefractive glass," Appl. Opt. 38, 619 (1999); manufacturer data for laser-line notch filters (thin-film and volume Bragg grating types) for the typical bandwidth and OD figures quoted.