FWHM to Sigma Converter
How does a full width at half maximum compare with a standard deviation, a 1/e2 radius or a pulse’s shape parameter? Enter any one width of a Gaussian, Lorentzian or sech2 profile and the converter gives all the others, the share of the area inside the FWHM and, for a pulse duration, the transform-limited bandwidth. Background: FWHM, time-bandwidth product and pulse duration.
Two short experiments. Each one sets the inputs, says where to look, and asks for a prediction before it shows the result.
These checks run in your browser on every load. The width ratios and area fractions are compared with their closed forms.
| Check | Expected | Computed | Tolerance |
|---|
The expected values are the closed-form ratios for each profile: 2√(2 ln 2) for the Gaussian, 2 arccosh √2 for sech2, and the standard time-bandwidth products 2 ln 2/π and (2 arccosh √2/π)2. The tolerance is the largest difference from Expected that still passes, relative to Expected or to 1, whichever is larger.
For a Gaussian the half-maximum points are at , so
and the 1/e and 1/e2 half widths are and . For a laser beam the 1/e2 half width is the beam radius , so and . A Lorentzian has FWHM and 1/e2 half width , but no finite standard deviation, because its tails fall only as . A sech2 pulse , the shape of a soliton and of most passively mode-locked lasers, has
A transform-limited pulse has the intensity time-bandwidth product for a Gaussian and 0.3148 for sech2, with both widths taken as FWHM. All the ratios are for the profile itself; a measured width also includes the instrument’s own response, which for two Gaussians adds in quadrature.
Worked example
A Gaussian peak with FWHM 2.355 has ; 76.10 % of its area lies between the half-maximum points, against 68.27 % within . A 100 fs Gaussian pulse at its transform limit has a spectral width of , 9.420 nm at 800 nm; a 100 fs sech2 pulse needs only 3.148 THz, 6.721 nm.
Related: the knife-edge beam width calculator measures a beam radius, the coherence length calculator uses line shapes, and the measuring ultrashort pulses article covers autocorrelation. See also autocorrelation.
References: J.-C. Diels and W. Rudolph, Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena, 2nd ed., Academic Press (2006), chapter 1.