Finesse

The ratio of a resonator's free spectral range to the width of one resonance, F = FSR/Δν: the number of resolvable linewidths per period, set by the loss per round trip alone. For a Fabry-Perot cavity with mirror reflectivity R it is π√R/(1 − R), 313 at R = 0.99 and 314,000 at R = 0.99999; formula with internal loss, relation to Q and photon lifetime, typical values, and what limits it.

Finesse measures how sharp a resonator's resonances are compared with their spacing:

F=FSRΔν1/2

where FSR is the free spectral range and Δν1/2 the full width at half maximum of a resonance, both in the same units. A finesse of 300 means the cavity resolves 300 distinct frequencies within one period of its response, and it means that a photon survives roughly F/2π, about 50, round trips before it is lost. That second reading is the physical one: finesse is set entirely by the fractional loss per round trip, and unlike the quality factor it does not grow with the size of the resonator.

From the round-trip loss

With the round-trip amplitude factor ρ=R1R2 e−αiL, which collects the two mirror reflectivities and the internal loss αi over the length L, the finesse of a Fabry-Perot cavity is

F=πρ1−ρ

which reduces to πR/(1−R) for equal lossless mirrors and to π/(1−R), or 2π divided by the round-trip power loss, when the loss is small. The same expression holds for a ring resonator with ρ the amplitude transmission around the ring including the couplers. Internal loss enters on the same footing as mirror transmission, and since e−αiL caps ρ however good the mirrors are, it caps the finesse: a 10 cm cavity in a medium with 0.001 dB/cm of loss cannot exceed a finesse of about 1,400 even with perfect mirrors, which is why the highest-finesse cavities are evacuated. The formula is the first-order one; the exact Airy linewidth differs from FSR/F by less than 0.001 % at R=0.99 and by 2 % at R=0.5, and the Fabry-Perot Cavity Calculator reports both.

ResonatorFinesse
Laser diode chip, cleaved facets (R=0.31)2
Uncoated silicon waveguide facets with 2 dB/cm loss, 5 mm2
Fused-silica etalon, 90 % coatings30
Silicon ring resonator50 – 1,000
Two-mirror cavity, R=0.99313
Silicon nitride ring, low loss1,000 – 30,000
Two-mirror cavity, R=0.999931,400
ULE reference cavity, R=0.99999314,000
Best supermirror cavitiesabove 106

Finesse, Q and photon lifetime

The three sharpness measures are the same information in different units. The quality factor counts linewidths in the optical frequency rather than in the FSR,

Q=ν0Δν=F ν0FSR=m F

with m the longitudinal mode number, so a 10 cm cavity with a finesse of 314,000 at 1550 nm has Q=4×1010 while a silicon ring with a finesse of 300 and a mode number of 60 has Q=18,000. The photon lifetime is the linewidth turned into a time, τp=1/(2πΔν)=F Trt/2π with Trt the round-trip time, which is the origin of the F/2π round trips above. Finesse is the natural figure for filters and spectrometers, where the FSR is the period of interest; Q is the natural figure for lasers, sensors and nonlinear optics, where the absolute linewidth and the stored energy matter.

What limits it

Mirror transmission is the design choice, but the ceiling is set by everything else: mirror absorption and scatter, which for ion-beam-sputtered supermirrors sum to a few parts per million and allow finesses of a few hundred thousand; diffraction loss when the mirrors are too small or the cavity too close to instability; and in integrated resonators the propagation loss of the waveguide, which is why a silicon nitride ring at 1 dB/m reaches a finesse of tens of thousands while a silicon ring at 2 dB/cm stays in the hundreds. Measuring finesse is measuring the linewidth: a swept-laser transmission scan gives Δν and the FSR together, and cavity ring-down gives the photon lifetime directly for the highest finesses, where the linewidth is too narrow to scan.

References: A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986), chapter 11. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 2019), chapter 11. G. Rempe, R. J. Thompson, H. J. Kimble, and R. Lalezari, "Measurement of ultralow losses in an optical interferometer," Optics Letters 17, 363 (1992).

New entries, monthly

The glossary grows every month. One short email lists what’s new, nothing else.